Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Welcome To A Bizarre Afternoon With Donald Driver

The Cyber Manager: Where Do We Start?

What will the starting XI look like in Arizona in two weeks time?

With the Desert Diamond Cup less than two weeks away and representing the Revs first true test against MLS competition, it's time to introduce a feature I'll be running with all season long: The Cyber Manager (name pending, I'm picky). Think of it as along the lines of those old Monday Morning Quarterback themes in football: each week I'll outline what I would do personally with the club, from lineups to subs and tactics. It's always good to have second (and sometimes third and fourth) opinions, and there's never a shortage of questionable decisions in the beautiful game. Let's kick it off and take a look at where the Revs stand right now, after the jump!

Star-divide

It's unquestionably an inexact science this early in the season to put players into positions and roles, but given what the Revolution have in place and SIGNED right now in camp (meaning, I'm not counting on Moreno) there's enough here to at least get me started.

FORMATION: 4-4-1-1

It's essentially a 4-5-1 with an attacking mid playing behind the striker. There's so much depth at midfield that it's difficult to not use it to our advantage. With the lack of depth and quality at striker, playing one striker up top with a little help behind seemed logical. As the season progresses and we see more of the newcomers, I'll be open to changing it up.

GOALKEEPER: Reis.

DEFENDERS (L-R) : Barnes-Soares-Lozano-Alston.

I'm not ready to give the LB reigns to rookie Generation Adidas player Tyler Polak just yet. Penciling in a rookie on opening day is daunting, and while he gets his feet underneath him in professional soccer I'll give the job to Barnes, who performed well enough once he adjusted to the move from CB. It appears Lozano and Soares have gotten to know each other quite quickly, and if the reports are to believed about the communication not being a problem, I see this as a good partnership in the center of the defense. Kevin Alston remains the stalwart at RB until someone outplays him, and that doesn't seem likely for quite some time.

MIDFIELDERS (L-R): Nyassi-Joseph-Feilhaber-Mansally.

Again, for now, this is how I'd like to play it. Speed on the outside, and our two best midfielders (and players in general) in the middle of the park controlling the game. Service is the first concern of mine, as neither of the two wide midfielders showed much of it last season, but in this system, I'd like to see more in-cutting and breaking down through the middle out of these two. Nobody else really stands out enough in the midfield to move these players out. I thought of putting Feilhaber out wide and playing Simms in the middle in place of Nyassi, but at least at the start, I'd like to take a more aggressive, offensive approach. I think Simms will see his share of minutes, especially if New England is playing with a lead late.

FORWARDS: Rowe-Sène

Rookie midfielder Kelyn Rowe will actually slot in behind Saër Sène in this formation, giving the Frenchman someone quick and smart to play off of up top. It's almost as if the new striker is winning the job by default, as there is literally no one that I could put in his place in good conscience. Cardenas, Schilawski, Fagundez, Kinne all have something to prove to me early in this season to garner more playing time. Each striker has something they need to address or show before they can crack the XI: Cardenas and Fagundez are both undersized, and need to prove that they can be effective in spite of that. Schilawski has the tendency to disappear in matches and will go long stretches without scoring. Kinne, I feel, just needs a little more time and opportunity to blossom, both luxuries he was not given under Steve Nicol.

BENCH: Murray-Polak-Tierney-Simms-McCarthy-Guy-Cardenas

The obvious omission is Diego Fagundez. This won't last long I don't think. I know he's the golden child of Foxboro these days and viewed by some as a savior, but I'm just not ready to count on a 17 year old undersized forward week in and week out over a grueling season schedule. However, we all know how things change with injuries, suspensions and such, and Fagundez will be the first person in mind. Think of him as the 19th man. Schilawski has to really show me something also. I didn't think there was a need to put two out and out forwards on the bench given that any one of Nyassi, Mansally, Rowe, Feilhaber and even Joseph could make the move up top in a switch. Polak and Tierney will mostly see work as defenders (Tierney could serve as a left mid in a pinch also), while SImms and McCarthy will help fill more defensive minded midfield roles. Schilawski and Cardenas will serve as the forward subs for now, given that I've seen far too much of Zak Boggs in the midfield, and would only insert him in the bench for offensive purposes.

Again, this is only going off of what we have right now in camp and signed. I didn't include trialists like Purdie and Brettschneider as it is unclear whether or not they will even make the team to begin with. As time goes by and certain players and storylines play themselves out (Moreno, etc.) I'm sure this will change almost weekly according to form, fitness, and production.

SUBS AND TACTICS: For me, the first move off the bench would be to bolster the attack if needed. So, depending on the flow, I'd either sub off Nyassi or Mansally for a forward, most likely Cardenas, bringing in more pace to the match and switching to a 4-4-2 with Rowe moving out wide and leaving Feilhaber in the middle to create opportunities for the two strikers up top.

Defensively, the moves would be relatively simple: If Barnes needed the sub, it'd be a straight swap with Polak, or if one of the CB's needed to be subbed, Barnes would slide to CB and Polak to LB.

In the midfield, it's hard to see much change, but with a lead, I'd switch out Rowe for Simms, and have the striker play alone up top in a true 4-5-1 with Joseph and Simms playing the two defensive mid spots.

OVERVIEW: So that's the first installment of Cyber Manager. It's tough to come up with tactics and lineups so early into the year without seeing too much of the team in live action. However, it's definitely a starting point going into the first preseason tournament of the year. The philosophy is pretty evident: Speed, creativity, and aggressive flowing play with solid, veteran presence in the middle of the field to generate flow. We'll see how the Revs line up in two weeks out west, and will certainly have more to talk about once they've taken the pitch.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

with that midfield line up, would you imagine Shalrie sitting far back as more of a sweeper/stopper, or getting into the attack more often in a box-to-box role? If we’re running this 4-4-1-1 I’d probably actually switch Rowe and Feilhaber. That might seem blasphemous, but I’d like Benny closer to goal as his defense is lacking.

I’ve also been noticing that our backline, if Lozano works out, is pretty good. Soares and Alston are very good MLS players (even if I tend to think Alston is rated a bit too high), add in Lozano, and whomever ends up at left back (I have a feeling it may be Polak sooner than later) and then with Barnes and Tierney (I know he’s more of a MF) there’s a bit of depth. Plus Matt Reis in the back. That’s potentially a very good backline.

Contributor: The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Founder: Viva La Futbol
Twitter: @MindOfAbram

by Abram Chamberlain on Feb 15, 2012 1:41 PM EST reply actions  

4-2-1-2-1 (4-3-3)

Sene———
--Rowe——Cardenas
-———Feilhaber
-—Joseph——Simms
Tierney——————————Alston
-——-Lozano—Soares

Might as well make the games entertaining. We have a weird group of players a ton on MF/FWD slash players. Need to use what we have and in my opinion this is the best group of players. Joseph and Simms sit on top of the back 4 and distribute (Joseph should have more leeway to get forward). Our biggest issue offensively last year was support in the attacking 3rd this allows us to have that support without abandoning defense. I think Rowe is wasted out left on a 4-4-2 but ultimately i think that’s what Heaps will play and do. With Sene and Cardenas/(hopefully) Brettschneider as our 2 strikers.

by Jwuer on Feb 15, 2012 2:00 PM EST reply actions  

This was my thought as well, still think I might swap out Rowe and Feilhaber. Rowe is better defensively (based solely on college, so who knows how that translates). I really think Benny is more suited to play closer to goal as he is, in my opinion, a defensive liability.

Contributor: The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Founder: Viva La Futbol
Twitter: @MindOfAbram

by Abram Chamberlain on Feb 15, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I see your point with Rowe..

but I think from the position of having Shalrie and Simms withdrawn behind them their isn’t much for Feilhaber to do defensively other than not allow them to walk through the seam between Simms and Joseph. With Simms this is the first time we’ve had a true destroyer solely for defensive purposes. Simms is really just there to kill any counter attacks and push the play to the outsides. I like having Feilhaber as a maestro behind 3 dynamic attacking players in Sene, Rowe, and Cardenas. The point of this is to hide the fact that we really only have 2 true wingers in Nyassi and Guy which makes our version of the 4-4-2 way too defensive. The point of this is to keep Rowe and Cardenas inside on the attack and have the backs overlap behind them which we seem to NEVER do when we were playing the 4-2-3-1 last year. The whole point of this is so that you don’t have Rowe or Cardenas just crossing into Sene who is being defended by himself 3 v1 in the box.

by Jwuer on Feb 15, 2012 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Curious if Rowe will be a full-time player

I wonder if the FO will put any pressure on Heaps to keep Rowe off the pitch, sort of like Philly has done with Mwanga. It’s great that he’s a GA, but if he plays too much he could graduate this year like Valentin did for Chivas. If he graduates GA too quick, then it’s essentially taking on -what I assume would be- a hefty salary.

Contributor: The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Founder: Viva La Futbol
Twitter: @MindOfAbram

by Abram Chamberlain on Feb 15, 2012 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a real good question

He’s playing very well in preseason so far so I figured he’d be a lock to get heavy minutes, but I hadn’t thought of that little dynamic. Interesting thought

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Feb 15, 2012 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

If there is $ involved

I have no doubt the decision will be handed down then. I didn’t know about this aspect, but you can see where my faith in office lies in terms of $ situations.

by Jwuer on Feb 15, 2012 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it's still league money, not team money.

Either way the ownership doesn’t pay extra. It becomes a cap issue, where if you were planning on having a player for free for two seasons but all of a sudden he graduates after one (a la Valentin), it becomes difficult to forecast your cap space a couple seasons down the road.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Feb 15, 2012 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Ohhh

misunderstood. That makes me feel a bit better

by Jwuer on Feb 16, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Feilhaber/Rowe

I placed Feilhaber in the center mid position because I really wanted that veteran presence in the center of the field. I almost feel like Rowe and Benny are the same type of player, so they could easily swap in and out.

Contributor to SBNation Blog "The Bent Musket", covering all things New England Revolution.

by Matty Jollie on Feb 16, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Nyassi or Mansally over Ryan Guy?

Really? I can’t get behind that. The rest of it, sure, but not that.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Feb 15, 2012 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with that 100%

Still don’t think the 4-4-2 is over conducive to the players we have though.

by Jwuer on Feb 15, 2012 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

what is with the love affair??

Ok, Ryan Guy had that one good twenty minute stretch last summer (I saw it from the press box last year when I flew home to cover it) and then was buried on the bench and played in reserve matches. I liked what I saw, but, it’s hard for me to place him in the lineup when every time we saw him he was playing out of position. He deserves some minutes though, and after 45-55 minutes of watching Mansally/Tierney/Nyassi on the wings, I’m sure Guy would be a decent replacement.

Contributor to SBNation Blog "The Bent Musket", covering all things New England Revolution.

by Matty Jollie on Feb 16, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

He played a bunch with Zerka in the last couple of matches

He ALWAYS looked good. And not just the two goals he scored in that one game. He’s quick, decent on the dribble, and has a mean cross. A winger in the classic mold, but he’s not afraid to cut inside when asked. Compared to everyone else on this roster, he’s the gold standard. Compared to the best wingers in MLS…average to good, probably.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Feb 16, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Plus

I think we have learned that Nicol had favorites and liked to bury certain players (cough Kinne cough) on the bench and in the reserves when they probably didn’t deserve it. So using that as evidence that Guy isn’t that great isn’t a good idea.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Feb 16, 2012 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

NYassi? Mansally? Really?

Matty,
this is your blog so you write what you want but honestly, thinking that these two can play is either a provocative statement to generate discussion (success) or not having watch these guys play for the past two years.

These two would barely be on the bench of any other MLS teams.

Based on the current roster, I would go 4-2-3-1. Same defense. Sims and Joseph as defensive holders. Cardenas – Benny – Tierney (or Rowe if he can play at that level right from the bat) – Sene in front (by default).

by ExiledinUSA on Feb 15, 2012 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

Trust me, I know exactly what you mean...

I think 80% of me putting the Gambians on the wings was attributed to not really knowing much of what else we have. I thought about Nyassi on the right wing, Rowe on the left, Feilhaber playing behind Sene, and Joseph and SImms in the middle. Let’s not act like Nyassi and Mansally were my first choice, because then I’d challenge my own sanity.

It won’t take much to get those guys out of the lineup. I still think they’re good enough to make the match squad of 18 every week, and at least bring that to the table.

Contributor to SBNation Blog "The Bent Musket", covering all things New England Revolution.

by Matty Jollie on Feb 16, 2012 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't like Rowe playing on the wing...

Unless he’s given free room to roam. If he’s forced to play as a natural winger it’s a waste of his ability. If he’s playing tucked in like a 4-3-3 then I’m fine with him on the wing.

by Jwuer on Feb 16, 2012 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

i have my own gripes with the Gambians

but am anxious to see them this year under the Heaps regime.

i do tend to lean towards this same 4-2-3-1 formation though (particularly as a Man City fan, i like this system, especially when it works the right way). i see it as:

Sene—————-
Cardenas——Benny———Rowe
-————Simms—-SJ————-
Tierney—Soares—Lozano—Alston

it would work if Feilhaber can hold up the ball and play more like a CF. and it also allows Shalrie to be the Yaya Toure type of creative midfielder

by Corey E. Major on Feb 17, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Bent Musket is an in-depth look at the New England Revolution by fans like us. We will feature news, interviews, match reports and opinion, with occasional forays into greater New England soccer.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Stadium Location and Attendance
Small
Portland misfired all day
Small
STH Meeting

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Regiment Commander

Headshot_1_small Steve Stoehr

Cavalry

_corey_small Corey E. Major

Musketeers

N1145234711_30219220_7116_small Matty Jollie

Profile2_small Abram Chamberlain

TheIndirectKick