New England Revolution Starting XI: Where We Stand
Now that preseason has begun for the New England Revolution, it's time to take stock of what the team has and where it needs to improve. In that vein, I've decided to do a quick "if the season began tomorrow" examination of the optimal starting XI (and game day 18) on the roster right now.
I have taken a few liberties. I'm assuming the Supplemental Draft selections are all signed (they most certainly are not) and am using John Lozano and Fernando Cardenas, despite the fact that they do not officially join the roster until the transfer window opens on the 24th. Frankly, though, without them, I'd have almost nothing to choose from, so give me a break.
The formation will be a basic 4-4-2, since there's been no indication thus far of what sort of system Jay Heaps may try to install. Lineup available after the jump.
------------------Cardenas-----Fagundez--------------------
-----------------------Feilhaber-------------------------------
-Tierney-------------------------------------------------Guy-
-------------------------------Joseph---------------------------
----Polak------------------------------------------Alston-----
----------------------Lozano----Soares-----------------------
----------------------------Reis---------------------------------
Bench: Bobby Shuttleworth, Darrius Barnes, Sainey Nyassi, Kelyn Rowe, Zack Schilawski, Ryan Kinne, Clyde Simms
Immediately what jumps out is a crippling lack of defensive depth. Darrius Barnes is the only true defender I had left to include on the bench. Kevin Garcia may be able to play on the back line, and may end up there, but I doubt he'll be a Barnes-caliber player this season. Lozano gets the nod in central defense over Barnes mostly because he's the new guy and I have high hopes for him. The two are basically interchangeable in my mind.
Out of the SuperDraft selections, Rowe is arguably more pro-ready, but his position is occupied by a United States full international in Benny Feilhaber, so he gets bench duty while Tyler Polak jumps straight in as the starting left back. Is it too much to hope that Polak will hit the ground running a la Seth Sinovic in 2010? Probably, but then again, he is a more-heralded talent coming out of college. In any case, unless he's an unmitigated disaster, I find that putting him out there to sink or swim is preferable to forcing Chris Tierney or Barnes to play out of position again.
Clyde Simms rides the bench because, while a very good central midfielder for this league, he isn't better than Shalrie Joseph. He also kicks Stephen McCarthy to the curb because, given the choice between the two, I want Simms entering the game late to seal a victory. I haven't forgotten McCarthy's error on the first Philadelphia goal in that embarrassing loss, and Simms' veteran savvy is better for that situation anyway. That isn't to say that I believe McCarthy shouldn't see time this season - he was relatively solid last year before injuries knocked him out - but Simms is the obvious choice.
Tierney and Guy on the wings gives the Revs solid if unspectacular wing play. I wrestled with the idea of putting Cardenas on the wing and benching Tierney, but in the end the lack of forward options bumped the Colombian up top and left the wing open. Ryan Guy deserves to start on this team after last season's performances, and I don't think I'll get any argument from you readers there (not that I won't welcome the argument if you do). Nyassi's speed could be an asset late, but unless Jay Heaps can help him develop a final product, the Gambian's run as a starter should be over.
Finally, up top we have Cardenas and the wonderkid Diego Fagundez. I really, really don't want to see Diego as an everyday starter this season. He's still young and still growing physically, and to ask him to shoulder the load as a professional starting striker is as much unfair as it is potentially damaging. Unfortunately, the idea of starting Ryan Kinne (unproven) or Schilawski (proven to be subpar) is a lot less attractive right now. Cardenas starts up there with him because he apparently has experience at forward, and as a left-footed speedster he brings a dimension to the attack that the team hasn't really seen before.
From there, the subs filled out logically. Kinne needs to get on the pitch this year, so he makes the bench. I sincerely believe that Rowe will contribute this season and thus he needs to be available as well. Shuttleworth is the second-best goalkeeper on the roster. The rest have already been discussed.
Players who didn't make the matchday squad: Stephen McCarthy, Zak Boggs, Tim Murray, Kenny Mansally, Dawyne Smith, Alec Purdie, Kevin Garcia, Michael Roach.
Agree or disagree? Have questions or opinions of your own? Continue the discussion in the comments below!
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why 2 strikers?
Given that we have no one who can play in offense, why putting two in front?
You can go 4-1-4-1 with Rowe instead of Fagundez and next to Feilharber.
Or you can go 4-2-3-1 with Simms instead of Fagundez next to Joseph.
In the current roster, we do not have the talent to put two in front, sadly and with all the midfielder we have, it make sense to go with 5 in it.
By the way, any update on Jaqua and Bhorman (Sp), the re-entry draft picks?
By the way, who needs Sinovic? We have Domi. Oh … Wait …..
I went generic
I wanted to make an accurate prediction based on what Heaps will do. I feel like he may take the Nicol approach of shoehorning everyone into his favored system and going with that, but since I had no idea, I decided to go basic. Either of those alternatives are certainly viable.
As for Jaqua and Borman, no updates that I’ve heard recently.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Jan 19, 2012 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
Lineup
Reis: GK. No arguments here I hope!
Alston: Right Wingback. Heaps wants attacking formation so Alston is pushed up a little.
Lozano: CB. Heaps indicated he wants him to slot right in next to Soares.
Soares: CB. Again, hopefully no arguments here!
Polak: Left Wingback. Polak indicated he likes to get forward and Heaps wants more attack from outside backs.
Simms: Defensive Midfield. Right in front of CBs. Simms will help with possession and indicated he likes to “do the dirty work” to allow others to go forward.
Joseph: Central Midfield. Obviously allows him to get forward when needed and to help with possession when not.
Benny: Attacking Midfield. Right behind forwards, will get assists and score goals. Allows for creativity.
Guy: Right Wing Forward. Allows for more attack from wingers.
?: Center Forward: Obviously if we started now we’d need Fagundez, Kinne or Schilawski, but really hoping Revs can sign a CF who doesn’t rely on chances as much as Lekic did, even so, with this system/players I see a bit more chances.
Cardenas: Left Wing Forward. Same as Guy. This was tough, I wanted Tierney for his free kicks, corners and crosses but gonna have to bench him because Cardenas seems more attack minded.
Bench: Pretty similar to Steve’s bench
This is basically the dreaded 4-3-3 but I think it could be better with these players and (fingers crossed, knock on wood) a solid new striker!
I like all your choices here
and see it working in more of a 4-2-3-1 than a true 4-3-3. mostly because i think Benny has the qualities to anchor the team both on attack and defense, so he could push up with Guy and Cardenas on the attack as well as pull back and assist Joseph and Simms on defense in front of the back 4.
the biggest missing piece, as you pointed out, is that center forward/striker that we so desperately need.
by Corey E. Major on Jan 20, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
4-2-3-1
Does make more sense. I just wasn’t really sure of Benny’s defensive capabilities and thought Joesph and Simms are two of the best defensive mids in the league (I know Simms is a stretch but I really do think he was underrated for his work in DC)
Let’s look this way: Knowing from what Heaps has said there will likely be four defenders and based on all the mids there is no way it’s a 4-4-2 for me at this point. Why pick and sign Simms and draft Rowe if they were planning to bench them?
As for the striker, I’m really hoping Heaps has a lot of it figured out and can get who he wants!
Simms was underrated but he's not #2
Osvaldo Alonso, Kyle Beckerman, Jeff Larentowicz, Daniel Hernandez come before him, just off the top of my head
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Jan 20, 2012 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
I said
he and Joesph were two of the best. I didn’t mean Joesph was number 1 and Simms number 2. All of those players you mentioned are clearly better than Simms, some even are on par or better than Shalrie (debatable). What I was really trying to get at is Joesph and Simms together seems like a very talented pairing in defensive midfield.
Definitely could be
I just have to wonder if Heaps can get this team to pull it off. We were pretty abysmal in the 4-2-3-1 last season
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Jan 20, 2012 9:03 PM EST up reply actions
Where do we stand?
A LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG way away from where we should be.
My Twitter @totheights
Quick Question
If Heaps want lateral back who moves forward and join the attack (Think Dani Alves of Barca or Sergio Ramos of Real), do we really need dedicated wingers?
We could increase the number of holding midfielders to help the defense at the expense of pure wingers.
What do you think?
We would still need wingers
But you can use more versatile two-way wingers who are able to cut inside rather than pure width guys. Or you would have forwards push wide at times. One of the most powerful options for any team out wide is the overlap, and if your fullbacks are the only guys giving you width, they can’t overlap with anyone.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Jan 20, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
Tierney the starter??
Please no. Don’t you think that someone (Benny or Rowe) is going to have to suck it up and play on the wing? I think Heaps will do his best to get both of those bodies on the field at the same time. He understands the desperate need for creativity. I’m sure he’d rather have Rowe out there than Tierney who has proven that all he can do is cross.
We also DESPERATELY need a striker. We are in worse shape then last year in the forward department. I am somewhat confident that Heaps will find his proven goal scorer.
I know it isn’t a pressing need, but I really don’t think baby face bobby is the heir to the throne. I wish the Revs would start grooming someone else.
Benny wide is not an option in my mind
He doesn’t see enough of the ball and his effectiveness is greatly diminished. He’s a better passer and controller than he is a crosser and slasher, so he needs to be central. Rowe is an interesting option, but I’m just going on what his stated preferences are now.
Tierney works hard, defends well as a winger (less so as a left back), and is a killer crosser of the ball, both from the run of play and in dead ball situations. He makes up for his lack of speed and ability to beat a man by somehow managing to send in crosses from deeper positions that bend around even the best-positioned defenders seeking to block him. I’ll take that given the way the roster looks right now.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Jan 20, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Might be a semantic issue
In my mind a winger is a someone who stays on the wing and run it up and crosses in the box (think a young Ryan Giggs) and pick up the lateral back who decides to move up.
Someone who does check inside and do overlap is a right/left side midfielder in my world so we are saying similar things.
What I like about Tierney is his delivery on dead ball. It is quite an important skill, especially if practiced.
The other thing with the lone striker is that you cannot have a poacher. You will need someone who does run, who can bully his way through. If we have someone who needs good service to finish, we will have another tough season. So we need a forward but one that will meet the team playing style …..
Polak starting?
Seems unlikely.
From the pieces in play it looks like Tierney back to LB, and the players for a 4-3-3 or some variation on it. No matter the formation, the team is SCREAMING out for a true CFW.
I just winced...
I say why not start the youngsters? I can’t handle Tierney on the left, no pace. Sadly, I’d take Nyassi over him.
Contributor to SBNation Blog "The Bent Musket", covering all things New England Revolution.

by 













