Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Relegation Simulation: Rewriting College Football History

Cochrane, Dube, Phelan Represent Revolution In Re-Entry Draft

Photo

MLS has released its list of eligible players for this year's Re-Entry Draft, and it features three New England Revolution players. Ryan Cochrane, Kheli Dube, and Pat Phelan will be available for selection by other MLS clubs after their options for the 2012 season were declined. Stage one of the draft will take place on Monday, December 5th.

The immediate takeaway from this news is that Shalrie Joseph is not on the list. That can really only mean one thing - he's coming back. As it stands, he either has to sign with the Revs (for whatever amount of money), seek a deal overseas, or rot in oblivion a la Dave van den Bergh. The latter isn't even an option, I think, for a man with Shalrie's competitive spirit, especially since he still has the ability to excel at this level. Going overseas is always an option - and we know he wanted it a few years ago when Celtic came calling - but he's quickly moving into a realm where his age could be prohibitive for clubs looking for him. All roads point to a return here.

Star-divide

As for the three featured, it's tough to say that any of the names are surprising. Cochrane simply was not a fit here. While it's unfair to single out any one defender as the cause of New England's backline woes, the fact is that Cochrane made a number of high-profile errors that led directly to goals. Now, the fact that he is entering the draft doesn't necessarily mean he's gone for next year - but I think that's a pretty good bet.

Kheli Dube is a bit of a sad story, really. He didn't get a shot to prove his worth to the team this year after suffering whiplash in a car accident early in the season. His body of work, though, isn't great: 72 appearances, 45 starts, 14 goals, and 9 assists in four seasons with the Revs. He was one of the top scorers in 2009 with eight goals, but scored four of them in one match. The final product has never really been there with Dube and he just isn't worth the $99k in guaranteed compensation he made in 2011.

Pat Phelan is probably the one guy on the list that has the best chance of renegotiating with the Revs and coming back; by definition, that means he might also be most likely to be selected. Phelan is a quintessential Steve Nicol man, at least in the mold of Nicol's last two or three seasons: tough, tenacious, and hard-working, but ultimately deficient in technique and skill. For every good quality he has, it is easy to find a poor one. He runs for 90 minutes; his tackles often cross the line into the nearly-criminal, making him a walking card liability. He has a good positioning sense in midfield on defense; he isn't a proficient passer. He has a rocket of a shot; he rarely puts it on frame. Phelan is the type of guy that a team lacking steel could use as a third or fourth option in the center of midfield, but the Revs probably aren't that team anymore.

If anyone is wondering why more players weren't made available, it's important to remember the rules of the draft. Of all the guys who had the requisite age and tenure to be made available, the three listed made the most sense. Darrius Barnes, Chris Tierney, Matt Reis (I think), and Kevin Alston would also have been eligible had their options been declined, but that was never going to be a good idea for this team anyway.

Watch this space, as we'll be talking a little bit about who the Revs should look at picking up in the coming days.

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

this paired with the Coria news

it almost seems like Heaps has some ideas/plans in motion to restructure and possibly overhaul the Revs defense. If we lost Cochrane in this re-entry draft, then we’d be left with Soares, Barnes and Alston.. and i guess Tierney, too. That’s a pretty thin defensive corps. seems like we’ll definitely be seeing some new faces on the back line pretty soon (…hopefully)

by Corey E. Major on Nov 30, 2011 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

What Coria news?

Cmajor, what news are you discussing?

Steve, I agree 100% with your analysis. Cochrane started well but became a total liability. I wondered if he played hurt.

Dhube was never the kind of threat he was paid should be.

I was never a big fan of Phelan. We do not need a bruiser. In addition, with his concussion issues, he could be sidelined for a long time. I always take skills over athleticism but sadly this approach is not shared by many in the MLS.

by ExiledinUSA on Nov 30, 2011 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

Coria's option was declined

Revs twitter feed announced it right after I posted this, and there hasn’t been any in-print news of it yet so it hasn’t really warranted a post as yet.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Nov 30, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

that would be unfortunate

I was never a fan of Phelen either….but I liked Coria.

by HenkRVL on Nov 30, 2011 3:02 PM EST reply actions  

Was his option declined?

I heard Coria’s contract wasn’t bought by the Revs. If that’s the case he’s now back to being a player of the Argentine club he came from correct?

Anyone else think the Revs should go for Bobby Boswell in the draft (I know there will be a forth coming blog post to discuss this but still…)?

by cbrown4747 on Nov 30, 2011 3:06 PM EST reply actions  

Yes on Boswell....

I was just coming back here to make the same comment. I think Boswell could help us out.

by HenkRVL on Nov 30, 2011 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Here are the other questions

Go for Boswell (current salary over $200,000) in stage 1 or take the risk and wait for stage 2 to negotiate a new salary?

Will Vancouver pick him first?

by cbrown4747 on Nov 30, 2011 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm surprised Houston let him go

I’d be inclined to take him at his $210,000 salary, frankly. He’s a quality defender and a top-notch set piece threat. I’m just not sure if he has to be signed at previous contract, or 105% of previous, which is the case in some circumstances.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Dec 1, 2011 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Wow!

So we are down to one good Central DEfender (Soares) and an average Right back (Allston).

I guess this is where we should focus our attention and energy. Barnes is a backup at best and Tierney is not a good defender. He belongs in the midfield.

I think that unless we have an average defense in 2012 (Not good, average), 28 points will be a stretch.

by ExiledinUSA on Nov 30, 2011 3:49 PM EST reply actions  

They won't

And I’m not sure it would be a great idea anyway (see: Rafa Marquez). Honestly, you don’t usually need to overpay for quality defending.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Dec 1, 2011 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe the Revs

are gonna do something like this for Joesph.

http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/article/2011/11/30/fcd-re-sign-hernandez-three-year-player-coach-deal

I can dream right? This would be pretty cool. It can be Heaps, an experienced assistant coach, and Shalrie all on the coaching staff!

by cbrown4747 on Nov 30, 2011 6:58 PM EST reply actions  

This is not good news

We can only hope the Revs know something we don’t.

by HenkRVL on Dec 1, 2011 7:54 AM EST up reply actions  

That's infuriating

Burns apparently thinks he can renegotiate contracts with Lekic and Zerka. Not sure they’d be open to taking a pay cut to play here, especially when I’m sure they weren’t 100% versed in the idea of contract options in MLS. Classic Burns, here.

Caraglio is different. If he has a steep purchase price, I’m not surprised they’re wary of taking him again…but then, they should have known and planned for this purchase price when they loaned him, since it was an agreed-upon part of the loan deal. Just a comical lack of foresight.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Dec 1, 2011 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

What gets me is that they sold him to us as our DP.

Like it was this huge thing…….and they get rid of him 3 months later.

This team disgusts me. The fact that Mike Burns is still running the operations makes me sick.

My Twitter @totheights

by totheights on Dec 1, 2011 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Caraglio transfer/loan fee was DP but not a real DP

I think that in our dire needs of good news, we bought in the fact he was a DP signing i.e. a superior player making superior money.

Caraglio (Who I like by the way) made small money ($54k) and was called a DP only because of the transfer fee.

The Revs have never bougth in the idea that DPs could improve a team. LA proved them wrong and the rest of the league will do the same until the Revs buy a few DP.

But these cost A LOT of money which the ownership had probably no interest in spending.

by ExiledinUSA on Dec 1, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

In fairness

Caraglio probably didn’t live up to the billing of his agreed-upon post-loan transfer fee. I mean, his scoring record extrapolated over a full season is still single digits…I can’t say I’m mad about them trying to negotiate a lower fee.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Dec 1, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, but ...

who is to blame?

If you sign a player who has been injured for a while and is out of shape and a few pounds too heavy, what do you expect?

Being strong and have a powerful shot is one thing, but you need the athleticism to use it.

I do not blame Caraglio. I think the Revs is paying the price for buying someone based on video. If they had scouted him live, may be they would have realized that they were overpaying.

With insight, it was a dumb move which smelled of desperation. They are trying to fix it by trying to negociate a lower fee.

by ExiledinUSA on Dec 1, 2011 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

The more I think about it, the more I see it as a low-cost move

Keep in mind that the Revs don’t actually pay their players, the league does. So the Revs got a possibly-good young attacking player that could excite and energize a team…or at least they MIGHT have gotten that. So instead of buying him outright, they loan him, pay however much above $335k (pro-rated for half a season) his loan fee put him since that’s all the team itself has to pay under DP rules, and see what he can do.

When you look at it from that perspective it looks a lot less dumb. He didn’t perform to a high enough level, so they don’t want to buy him at that price anymore. Should they have scouted him better? Maybe. But in the end, it really didn’t cost them anything in a season that was probably already lost.

Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket

by Steve Stoehr on Dec 2, 2011 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

What did I miss?

What has happened to Caraglio, Lekic and Zerka?

I really liked them, especially Zerka.

by ExiledinUSA on Dec 1, 2011 9:48 AM EST reply actions  

Just read the info .....

Not sure what to think … Will Zerka resign? May be … he was cut from his prior club. What about Lekic? Not sure he will take a cut .. he could go back to Denmark ….

Caraglio? A weird addition that could end up a weird end …

what worries me is that we have zero consistency … playing come and go for one or two years …. Success needs stability …. and I do not mean keeping Nyassi or Mansally …..

I am sure the FO has a logic in this perceived madness.

I just fail to see it.

Suddenly, I am getting a little nervous about 2012. I wonder who they will sign as a replacement …..

by ExiledinUSA on Dec 1, 2011 9:58 AM EST reply actions  

Why are you so sure the FO has logic?

When have they EVER shown that?

The club is regressing from MLS 1.0 {while everyone else is in 2.0) to MLS 0.5. Clearly have no idea what the hell they are doing.

My Twitter @totheights

by totheights on Dec 1, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Logic or Commitment?

I think the FO has a logic which is maximizing revenue of the FACILITY (i.e. the stadium).

They do not have a commitment to putting a successful team on the field because it would go against the logic.

The FO is basically running the team into the ground to extract the highest amount of cash.

Their goal is not a title. Their goal is to ensure that the stadium as well as Patriots Place generate revenues. They probably figured out that they additional revenues of 13K people 17 times a season was enough to cover the stadium opening fee and generate revenues to the other businesses at Patriots place.

May be I give them too much credit and they are indeed stupid but I doubt it. I think that they are following a business plan which does not include supporters/fans satisfaction maximization.

by ExiledinUSA on Dec 1, 2011 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Bobby Convey?

Sorry to change subject but what is your take on getting Bobby Convey in the re-entry draft?
For me, it was the most desirable name on the list.

by ExiledinUSA on Dec 2, 2011 3:07 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Bent Musket is an in-depth look at the New England Revolution by fans like us. We will feature news, interviews, match reports and opinion, with occasional forays into greater New England soccer.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Stadium Location and Attendance
Small
Portland misfired all day
Small
STH Meeting

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Regiment Commander

Headshot_1_small Steve Stoehr

Cavalry

_corey_small Corey E. Major

Musketeers

N1145234711_30219220_7116_small Matty Jollie

Profile2_small Abram Chamberlain

TheIndirectKick